I enjoyed Angela Carter’s take on Puss-In-Boots. The
perspective from which the story was presented most impressed me. It is not
very often that I read a story told completely in first person where the main
character often refers to themselves in third person. But what better character
to pull off this feat than the amazing Puss?? The fact that this story is
seemingly told through two different yet perfectly simultaneous perspectives is
completely appropriate within the stories context. Puss sees himself as such a magnificent
character that it is foolish to even consider his character could be contained
into one form of narration. The controlling force of the story is Puss and his
actions. In addition Puss is the only character that sees everything that goes
on. He understands his masters situation from dealing with him firsthand, and
he understands the princess situation through his meeting with his lover. Puss
is the eye that sees all and knows all. The major plot of the story is
obviously the predicament of Puss’ master, but the title of the story has
nothing to do with his master because, to put it plainly, he’s not important. The
title of the story is “Puss-In-Boots”. That is the title for a reason. Puss
pervades the story with his charismatic presence and this unbearable ego is successfully
conveyed through Puss’ mixing of the first and third person storyteller.
i agree with you about the perspective; Angela carter does a wonderful job illustrating puss-in-boots. but i think in many ways, we cant trust many of the comments made by puss; because hes such an unreliable narrator. this aspect of his charter in my opinion makes the story all that more hilarious: but i still wonder to what lengths do you think we can trust the unreliable narrator?
ReplyDelete