The play was a unique way to introduce the ideas about
life that the author was trying to convey. The way Saunders had the character
use the oatmeal metaphor was also very creative. Everyone can relate to that, and it is slightly silly in order to not turn the story completely negative
when talking about these emotional problems. Although the metaphors were
successful in getting the point across I also found them somewhat overwhelming
because there were so many of them in a short time. One skill I really enjoyed that Saunders
used was a long connected sentence on pages 76-77. The list of "wasn'ts"
helped very much to describe Winky and also made the reveal of the "was"
more dramatic. The author's view on religion was contradicting. In the
beginning he talked about how people deserve to be free from other people's
harm because they are children of God. Though, on page 80 the content was cynical
of the bible mocking the "seventy times seven" tale comparing it to
sharing candy. Towards the end of the story it became boring to
read. Almost the entire page 82 was
about a shirt the woman had on and how she wanted to change her shirt. That
topic could have been completed within a few sentences. Saunders also used word
repetition too often. He used the word “Dad” eight times within four short
sentences. It is too repetitive and annoying to the reader. I was very surprised to see the word "shit" on page 85 because it is a harsh word and the author had used "crap" multiple times earlier in the story which is much more gentile.
Good observations, many of which I didn't pick up on, such as the long connected sentence. I'm also very sensitive to word repetition, (even reviewing my last post, a couple of repeated words are bothering me haha) but the repeated use of the word "Dad" seemed to fit here, in my opinion. He was usually reflecting on his father, comparing himself. I thought that the word 'Dad' instead of a colder term such as 'father' served to maintain a loving tone, even though he regarded him as a failure in many ways. I also found the coarse language to be a bit shocking, though I thought it contributed to the overall voice.
ReplyDelete